Home
Login Register
Straits Times Index   

STI to cross 3000 boosted by long-term investors

 Post Reply 1001-1020 of 69565
 
Octavia
    23-Sep-2013 09:32  
Contact    Quote!

This Time Around The Fed IS The Bubble



Market tops always involve insanity. And today we have that in abundance.

On Wednesday the Fed surprised the world by not announcing a QE taper. Stocks and all ?risk? assets exploded higher. Today, a mere 48 hours later, Fed President Bullard says the Fed should taper soon. Stocks collapse. 

For the markets to react so significantly to such issues is a tell-tale sign that we are near a major top. The reliance on Fed stimulus has never been greater with even a hint of Fed policy actually having more impact that the policy itself. 

Rumors, whispers and threats dominate trading. This is the sign of market mania. 

The most important element is that this mania has been driven by the Fed, not some new technology (the Internet in the tech bubble), new asset growth (housing), but the Central Bank. 

In the past, the Fed has been the fuel for bubbles. This time around, the Fed IS the bubble itself, with its balance sheet expansion driving ALL assets higher.

So when this bubble bursts, it will be truly catastrophic because no one can bail out the Fed. Interest rates are already at Zero. QE is already running non-stop. There will literally be nothing the Fed can do.

I cannot say the top is in today, nor can I say it will be here in a week. But THE top is forming. And it will be absolutely awful when it?s done. We?ve now had three SERIAL bubbles in the markets in the last 13 years. Each bubble?s bursting has been worse than the last. The next one will be THE biggest one yet.

 

 
 
Octavia
    23-Sep-2013 08:38  
Contact    Quote!
Japan market closed for public holiday.
 
 
GorgeousOng
    23-Sep-2013 08:38  
Contact    Quote!

Wah! Lucky you don't forget to report to work!!!
Yah.... looking forward for next race....n ...hoot genting sp!!!!!
Hahaaaaaa!!!!

Cheers!!!!



Peter_Pan      ( Date: 23-Sep-2013 07:25) Posted:

What a race!!! Wonderful night race!!! Looking forward to the next race next year!!! :D

GorgeousOng      ( Date: 22-Sep-2013 22:33) Posted:


BREAKING: Red Bull's Sebastian Vettel has won the Singapore Formula Grand Prix Night Race. This is the third time he's topping the podium in Singapore and he has now a firm grip on a fourth straight world title.



 

 
Octavia
    23-Sep-2013 08:37  
Contact    Quote!
The Hong Kong Exchange has delayed the start of trading on both the securities and derivatives markets on Monday due to Typhoon Usagi.

There will be no trading in the morning if the typhoon signal remains at 8 or higher at 9 a.m Hong Kong with trading suspended for the whole day if storm signal 8 is still up at noon.
 
 
Peter_Pan
    23-Sep-2013 07:25  
Contact    Quote!
What a race!!! Wonderful night race!!! Looking forward to the next race next year!!! :D

GorgeousOng      ( Date: 22-Sep-2013 22:33) Posted:


BREAKING: Red Bull's Sebastian Vettel has won the Singapore Formula Grand Prix Night Race. This is the third time he's topping the podium in Singapore and he has now a firm grip on a fourth straight world title.


 
 
GorgeousOng
    22-Sep-2013 22:33  
Contact    Quote!

BREAKING: Red Bull's Sebastian Vettel has won the Singapore Formula Grand Prix Night Race. This is the third time he's topping the podium in Singapore and he has now a firm grip on a fourth straight world title.

 

 
eurekaw
    22-Sep-2013 21:53  
Contact    Quote!
Looks like STI going to drop further tomorrow
 
 
tanglinboy
    22-Sep-2013 21:40  
Contact    Quote!
So what will you be buying?
 
 
risktaker
    22-Sep-2013 21:08  
Contact    Quote!
Buy on weakness.... buy on opening weakness....
 
 
Peter_Pan
    22-Sep-2013 19:16  
Contact    Quote!
let the engines roar!!!!!
 

 
WanSiTong
    22-Sep-2013 11:07  
Contact    Quote!

Bullard Says Taper Possible After Close Call QE Decision



Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard, a voter on policy this year who has backed record stimulus, said the Fed may make a small cut to bond purchases in October after its narrow decision this week not to reduce accommodation.

?That was a borderline decision? after ?weaker data came in,? Bullard said yesterday on Bloomberg Television?s ?Bloomberg Surveillance? with Tom Keene and Sara Eisen. ?The committee came down on the side of, ?Let?s wait.??

Bullard called October a ?live meeting,? because ?it?s possible you could get some data that change the complexion of the outlook and could make the committee be comfortable with a small taper in October.?

The Fed this week unexpectedly refrained from reducing its $85 billion in monthly asset purchases, saying it needs to see more signs of sustained labor market gains. Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said Sept. 18 the central bank would decide on whether to taper purchases based on ?what?s needed for the economy.?

The Fed will be able to weigh the September jobs report and revisions of prior months as well as updated housing reports at its Oct. 29-30 meeting, Bullard said in a separate interview at Bloomberg?s headquarters in New York. ?This was a very close call so maybe the information would come in in a way that would change the complexion? of the outlook, he said.

Markets shouldn?t have been surprised by the decision because Federal Open Market Committee members have repeatedly said the decision to slow, or taper, would be ?data dependent,? Bullard said.

Slightly ?Dismayed?



?I?m a little dismayed at those in markets that are saying they?re surprised by this,? Bullard said. The Fed said that, ?if the economy was going to improve in the second half of the year, and if we saw that improvement, we would taper.?

Kansas City Fed President Esther George, who has consistently dissented against additional stimulus, said the central bank missed an opportunity to begin reducing bond purchases because markets were primed for such a move.

?Costly steps had been taken to begin to prepare markets for an adjustment in the pace of asset purchases,? George said yesterday in a New York speech. ?This week?s decision by the Fed to taper expectations and not bond buying surprised many, disappointed some like me.?

George has voted this year against all six decisions by the FOMC to press on with bond buying, saying the program risks creating imbalances in the economy and financial markets and pushing up long-term inflation expectations.

Possible Timetable



Bernanke?s remarks earlier this year on the prospect for tapering sent bond yields as much as a percentage point higher. Yields on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note climbed as high as 2.99 percent on Sept. 5 from 1.93 percent on May 21, the day before Bernanke first outlined a possible timetable for a reduction in the asset purchases.

This week?s FOMC decision not to taper helped reverse that rise and pushed back expectations for a tightening of monetary policy. The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note fell yesterday 0.02 percentage point to 2.73 percent in New York, according to Bloomberg Bond Trader prices. The yield earlier rose 0.03 percentage point after Bullard said the FOMC may trim bond buying next month.

Most economists surveyed say the Fed will begin curtailing asset purchases in December. Twenty-four of 41 economists surveyed Sept. 18-19 said the Fed will now wait until December before taking the first step in dialing down monthly bond purchases, according to a Bloomberg survey. The median estimate in an Aug. 9-13 poll projected the Fed would begin paring at this week?s meeting.

Tapering Odds



Investors see a 43 percent chance policy makers will increase the federal funds rate target to 0.5 percent or more by January 2015, based on data compiled by Bloomberg from futures contracts. The odds were 68 percent two weeks ago.

?Rates went up a lot over the summer? and ?for many on the committee that was a surprise,? Bullard said. It wasn?t a ?surprise for me because I?ve said the flow of QE matters a lot.?

So ?when we threatened to pull that back, markets naturally? sent yields higher, he said. Bullard during the past two months has urged the Fed to hold off on adjusting so-called quantitative easing, saying any change should depend on whether inflation moves toward the Fed?s 2 percent target. Policy shouldn?t rely on central bank forecasts for the economy that have proven too optimistic in the past three years, he said.

?We got some weaker data, so that put the committee in a position where we could delay,? he said. With inflation low, Bullard said ?we can afford to be patient.?

Adjust Guidance



The FOMC might also want to adjust its guidance on rates, Bullard said. A ?more likely? scenario than lowering the 6.5 percent unemployment threshold is introducing an inflation floor, Bullard said. The threshold would be something like ?so long as inflation was running below 1.5 percent,? the Fed wouldn?t raise interest rates, he said.

Bullard said he thought 1.5 percent was a good level because it?s ?symmetric? with the 2.5 percent threshold on the ?high side? of the central bank?s 2 percent goal for price increases. Bullard said he doesn?t see the Fed lowering its unemployment threshold.

?I don?t think that?s going to happen,? he said. ?If you move that threshold? it ?loses meaning? as ?markets would rightly think? the Fed could move them around ?for convenience.?

The Fed?s preferred measure of inflation, the personal consumption expenditures index, showed prices rising 1.4 percent in the 12 months ended in July.

?See Evidence?



Bullard, referring to inflation in remarks prepared for a speech in New York, said he wants ?to see evidence? of ?an increase before endorsing less accommodative policy action.?

Bullard dissented from the FOMC?s June 19 policy statement, saying the panel should ?signal more strongly its willingness to defend its inflation goal.? He dropped the dissent at the following meeting when the FOMC added language saying persistently low inflation posed risks to the economic outlook.

Bullard said he disagreed with the committee indicating a plan to taper bonds buying at that point, including stopping purchases in the middle of next year.

?It was premature to lay out the road map? for tapering in June, Bullard said. ?I do think it was a mistake.?

?We should defend our inflation target from the low side,? Bullard said.
 
 
Peter_Pan
    22-Sep-2013 10:51  
Contact    Quote!
much money to be made next week huat argh!!!!!
 
 
WanSiTong
    22-Sep-2013 08:10  
Contact    Quote!
Straits Times ST: the bias remains bullish.
Trading Central | 2013-09-20 06:49:00


Update on supports and resistances.

Pivot: 3185

Our preference: Long positions above 3185 with targets @ 3275 & 3330 in extension.

Alternative scenario: Below 3185 look for further downside with 3135 & 3070 as targets.

Comment: the RSI is well directed.

Key levels
3415
3330
3275
3237.53 last
3185
3135
3070

Copyright 1999 - 2013 TRADING CENTRAL
 
 
risktaker
    22-Sep-2013 07:49  
Contact    Quote!
Singapore market less affected.... but most blue chip expected to go lower... where mid cap and penny will continue to be favoured......we preferred penny stocks....

tanglinboy      ( Date: 22-Sep-2013 07:04) Posted:

It will be an interesting week next week

 
 
tanglinboy
    22-Sep-2013 07:04  
Contact    Quote!
It will be an interesting week next week
 

 
Peter_Pan
    22-Sep-2013 00:45  
Contact    Quote!
truck loads of sandwitches expired on friday
 
 
hlfoo2010
    21-Sep-2013 22:42  
Contact    Quote!




 

PABUK Satellite Loop towards JP, may it hit ABE  ???



 
 
 
halleluyah
    21-Sep-2013 22:41  
Contact    Quote!
hopefully lah....spare lorry park by the rd side in case got durian to pick boh....lol. 

Peter_Pan      ( Date: 21-Sep-2013 22:32) Posted:

morning eat ang ku kueh afternoon eat green huat kueh..lol

bishan22      ( Date: 21-Sep-2013 20:40) Posted:

Enjoy yr weekend. Monday got to eat ang ku kueh again. Hahaha.


 
 
Peter_Pan
    21-Sep-2013 22:32  
Contact    Quote!
morning eat ang ku kueh afternoon eat green huat kueh..lol

bishan22      ( Date: 21-Sep-2013 20:40) Posted:

Enjoy yr weekend. Monday got to eat ang ku kueh again. Hahaha.

Peter_Pan      ( Date: 21-Sep-2013 11:47) Posted:

Volatility is the name of the game...money is the reward of the game...wish all players have a great time...let the engines roar!!!!!


 
 
hlfoo2010
    21-Sep-2013 20:50  
Contact    Quote!
  • Home /
  • USA /
  • http://rt.com/usa/air-force-dropped-hydrogen-bomb-155/

US Air Force once dropped live hydrogen bomb on North Carolina - report

Published time: September 20, 2013 22:31
Edited time: September 21, 2013 01:06
B-52.(AFP Photo)

B-52.(AFP Photo)



The US Air Force inadvertently dropped an atomic bomb over North Carolina in 1961. If a simple safety switch had not prevented the explosive from detonating, millions of lives across the northeast would have been at risk, a new document has revealed.

The revelation offers the first conclusive evidence after decades of speculation that the US military narrowly avoided a self-inflicted disaster. The incident is explained in detail in a recently declassified document written by Parker F. Jones, supervisor of the nuclear weapons safety department at Sandia National Laboratories.

The document - written in 1969 and titled ?How I Learned to Mistrust the H-bomb,? a play on the Stanley Kubrick film title ?Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb? - was disclosed to the Guardian by journalist Eric Schlosser.

Three days after President John F. Kennedy?s inauguration, a B-52 bomber carrying two Mark 39 hydrogen bombs departed from Goldsboro, North Carolina on a routine flight along the East Coast. The plane soon went into a tailspin, throwing the bombs from the B-52 into the air within striking distance of multiple major metropolitan centers.

Each of the explosives carried a payload of 4 megatons - roughly the same as four million tons of TNT explosive - which could have triggered a blast 260 times more powerful than the atomic bomb that wiped out Hiroshima at the end of World War II.

One of the bombs performed in the same way as those dropped over Japan less than 20 years before - by opening its parachute and engaging its trigger mechanisms. The only thing that prevented untold thousands, or perhaps millions, from being killed was a simple low voltage switch that failed to flip.

Reuters

Reuters



That hydrogen bomb, known as MK 39 Mod 2, descended onto tree branches in Faro, North Carolina, while the second explosive landed peacefully off Big Daddy?s Road in Pikeville. Jones determined that three of the four switches designed to prevent unintended detonation on MK 39 Mod 2 failed to work properly, and when a final firing signal was triggered that fourth switch was the only safeguard that worked.

Nuclear fallout from a detonation could have risked millions of lives in Baltimore, Washington DC, Philadelphia, New York City, and the areas in between.

?The MK Mod 2 bomb did not possess adequate safety for the airborne alert role in the B-52,? Jones wrote in his 1969 assessment. He determined ?one simple, dynamo-technology, low voltage switch stood between the United States and a major catastrophe?It would have been bad news ? in spades.?

Before Schlosser brought the document to light through a Freedom of Information Act request, the US government long denied that any such event ever took place.

?The US government has consistently tried to withhold information from the American people in order to prevent questions being asked about our nuclear weapons policy,? he told the Guardian. ?We were told there was no possibility of these weapons accidentally detonating, yet here?s one that very nearly did.?

In ?Command and Control,? Schlosser?s new book on the nuclear arms race between the US and the Soviet Union, the journalist writes that he discovered a minimum of 700 ?significant? accidents involving nuclear weapons in the years between 1950 and 1968.
 
Important: Please read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy .